The Chaim Shaulson blog has become a sensation after Chaim Shaulson infamously made a career out of airing his dirty laundry in the public. The ultra-Orthodox community of New York was so appalled by Shaulson’s work that posters against him went up in 1996. In addition, he was at odds with a rival Hasidic sect, who sent him posters criticizing his religious practices and lifestyle.
Chaim Shaulson is a shady Lubav
It is difficult to read Chaim Shaulson’s blog without spotting the obvious red flags. shaulson blog Shaulson is a serial liar who invents sensationalist garbage for personal gain. He hates Litvisher and makes up vile stories to discredit him. He once insinuated that Rav Malkiel had homo hots for a London gvir. It’s like saying that a Londoner Satmar stabbed the wrong guy, broke all his bones, and had a miscarriage.
His sources
A successful blogger on the Haredim, Chaim Shaulson, has made a career out of airing his dirty laundry in print. The publisher of an ultra-Orthodox community in New York, Shaulson claims that his blog serves as a deterrent for other members of the community. In 1996, Shaulson was at odds with another Hasidic sect and faced posters. His website is published on a blog publishing service, and hosts several other blogs.
His first foray into journalism was with Tzofar, a newspaper that was a counter-publication to the Aguda’s Hamodia. shaulson blog It attacked Chabad and its senior rabbis, including the influential Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach. The publication eventually changed its name to Panim Hadashot. Shaulson and his wife and children moved to New York, where he earned a living by writing articles for the Hebrew-Yiddish newspaper Maariv.
His sources’ credibility
A writer’s sources can help establish or discredit his argument. To evaluate the credibility of a source, you can look at its purpose and author. If the author does not seem to have a solid understanding of the subject at hand, it is likely that the source does not have much credibility. If there is little or no information in the source, it may also be outdated. A critical reader will analyze the author’s purpose before accepting his sources.
